jump to navigation

More than an apology is needed in Durham April 16, 2007

Posted by reformedville in : Ethnicity, Government, Media , 2comments

The Rev. Al Sharpton felt Don Imus’s apology was not enough to back off calling for his firing. First let cut to the core of this :  A “Rev.” refusing to accept the apology of a person who admits they sinned and used poor judgment  as not being enough (especially in a shock jock format) makes the very title of “Rev. ” and “the god ” he represents suspect.   But using the Sharpton standard lets proceed.

 

From the very beginning of a case wrought with shaky details and conflicting evidence, the Duke 3 were tried and convicted in the media without the benefit  (or inconvenience) of a trial.  Not that these were choir boys, stripper parties will not be defended;  and the potential consequences of a stripper party for all involved should make both strippers and people who attend such parties seriously consider the implications of attendance of one of those parties potentially involves.

First there is no comparison in the two cases of Rutgers and Duke. Yes , people are sick of people perceived to have gotten off because of lawyers, and Kobe Bryant and OJ Simpson and Robert Blake are still on people minds; high profile people that were painted as guilty and “beat the charge” and have no culpability in the public’s view.However, lets see what similarities Simpson, Bryant, Blake and Duke cases had in common-evidence tampering and dishonesty by either the prosecution, police or witnesses. The prosecutor is responsible to the public to have investigated the crime, test the witnesses, test the evidence and proceed with the validated evidence or dismiss the case.  What do the cases of Simpson, Bryant and Blake have in common? Embellishment by the prosecution and in the rules of court, if the prosecutor embellishes (lies-distorts-commits fraud) the case to win a conviction  and it can be proven, chances are the jury will not convict- and I will go further out on the limb here- nor should they.

 Now to the Duke players. Did anyone watch sixty minutes last night? The thing that stood out in my mind more than anything was the one player talking about the ramifications for the rest of his life. When he dies, it will be reported, one of the three Duke rape suspects died today….. .  But yet, the stripper will not be charged with filing a false police report. The prosecutor in the case, with the young men relaying accounts of him not wanting to even examine evidence to exonerate- no moustache, atm pictures of being in another location, combined with no dna matches, tons of conflicts, the other strippers conflicting testimony.And do you think their comments about wondering when people give them more than a passing glimpse making them nervous is paranoia? If so consider this column doubting their innocence in the case:

Thoughts on the Duke Lacrosse Players Being Cleared

As everyone knows by now, the Duke lacrosse players have been cleared of all charges. While I respect the attorney general’s decision in the case, I stand by my original support of the woman that I still believe was assaulted. The three men charged have been declared innocent and perhaps they truly are (although it should be pointed out that cleared of all charges is not the same as innocent), but something happened in that house that night. I still believe that the woman was raped, and now, due to what seems to be a gross mishandling of evidence and a politically opportunistic, corrupt district attorney, we may never get to the bottom of the matter. This is a great travesty.

http://www.slanttruth.com/thoughts-lacrosse

Now if there was ever a time for black civil rights leaders to make their case of doing the right thing and not just race baiting today is the day, but my predicition is they will fall flat as ususal because they prosper from race relations being bad and they enhance them, not caring one iota about helping their alleged cause, but rather their personal cause.

How? If there was ever a time or a opening in American history to study prosecutorial misconduct, the american criminal injustice system and make a case for revamping it, today is the day. The upcoming months is the time with the trial of Durham County district attorney Mike Nifong upcoming. 

 I will be the first to readily admit, those who do not have money to prove innocence (and I am not talking about beating a charge you are guilty of), or gain the media spotlight (very rare), merely beome a conviction statistic for a prosecutor. The power of the prosecutor to hide, distort or manipulate evidence or target people is mind boggling. Blacks due to economic circustances and demographics are historically involved in more crimes and arrests. That is not racist, that is just a demographic fact.  Combine the two factors that then blacks will face the criminal injustice system more often than whites and they are the ones who will face the largest percentage of injustice in the justice system.

Today, when we see three rich white guys who were targeted for political reasons and poor judgment, the media spotlight comes upon the entire issue. But let’s not miss the forest for the trees. The case is unique perhaps in how far he turned his head to be a “attention ho ” and glean the spotlight for being “tough on crime”, with the details about whether a crime occurred or the ones charged were guilty being a incidental issue.  But I posit, it is in no way unique, this happens everyday. We have become politically correct and assume that everyone charged with a crime is guilty of that crime, because we just wouldn’t charge someone if they didn’t do it. In an instant solution society, charged equals convicted.

In steps Jesse and Al the Reverands of the god of race, not ministers of the gospel of Jesus Christ. Now is the time to put them to the test. Sharpton is already trying to spin his way out of blaming this all on Nifong , “for once ” taking the word of a prosecutor. Be consistent Rev.’s, that is all anyone asks. If you always questioned the motives of a prosecutor and always were for having the evidence tested and the credibility of the witnesses tested, despite the race, you would be a leader. But no, you have become nothing more than an attention “ho’s”, passing up a prime opportunity to make progress for true inroads into potentially revamping prosecutorial standards in America.

Jemele Hill  had this to say: (linked for full article)

So to Reade Seligmann, Collin Finnerty and David Evans, the three Duke lacrosse players whose lives were mangled by an unsupported rape accusation, I say two of the hardest words in the English language:

I’m sorry.

It’s not enough, and I won’t pretend that it is. For the last year, your lives and those of your families have been more difficult than any of us can possibly imagine. I’ll never know what it was like walking around normal society labeled a rapist. I’ll never know what it’s like to lose everything — your school, your program and your life — because of one unproven accusation.

You deserve all of that back and then some, but unfortunately, you won’t get it. You have every right to not trust anyone and think less of people. Duke University abandoned you. An overzealous prosecutor tormented you. A community, a nation, didn’t believe you. Journalists everywhere, sensing ratings and salivating over the salaciousness of black strippers and white athletes, chose to keep you under attack.

Not that this is a contest to see who was wronged the most, but the Rutgers women’s basketball team at least received justice, because Imus was suspended and dropped by MSNBC, which simulcasts his morning show. Plenty of people are outraged on their behalf.

But who is outraged on your behalf? What justice will you receive? Will the same networks that willingly aided in destroying your reputations now give you airtime to vent your frustrations? Will Jesse Jackson now offer the three of you a free scholarship like he did the “victim,” since he helped assist in your battered reputation?

Maybe the only modicum of fairness you have received is that the News & Observer in Raleigh decided to print the name of your accuser. I don’t normally advocate that the names of alleged victims be printed, but it feels right in this instance.

I know I’d certainly like to ask your accuser a few questions, even though she stood by her story as North Carolina’s attorney general vehemently proclaimed your innocence. Does she understand she has tanked not only her credibility, but that of other women, too? Does she understand the next time a woman comes forward with an allegation this serious, all of our minds will scroll back to this case, and we will be less inclined to believe her? Does she know women with legitimate sexual-assault complaints will look at this furor and decide silence is best?

I can’t deny that your race, gender and class have everything to do with how you were treated then and how you are treated now. Some people believe white men are exempt from sympathy and incapable of being maligned, so they will not swallow their pride and offer you the decency you should have received in the first place. Yes, you made an unwise decision to entertain strippers at a residence, but that just makes you guilty of being like 90 percent of college males.

There will be a lot of finger-pointing in the coming days and weeks about whose fault all of this was. The media will analyze each other. Civil-rights leaders who claim to be against all injustice will stay silent. Hopefully, you will be able to regain a fraction of the life you once had.

As Kathleen Parker adds:

The air is so thick with irony and hypocrisy these days, it’s hard to find oxygen to breathe.

Two athletic teams - one mostly white male, one mostly black female. Two examples of race and gender colliding. One rogue prosecutor; one rude shock jock. Obviously, there’s no comparison between the two cases in terms of consequences. While the Rutgers gals suffered hurt feelings and Mr. Imus lost his television gig and his radio show, the three Duke men potentially faced 30 years in prison and District Attorney Michael B. Nifong faces ethics charges. But they do share the complicating and distorting factors of race, sex and politics. And of course, they both share the opportunistic involvement of those two rogue race-baiting reverends, Al Sharpton and Jesse L. Jackson. Both not only came to the aid of the Rutgers basketball team but also grabbed the microphones before the accused Duke players had their day in court. In the Imus case, neither was willing to accept the radio host’s apology for his unfunny racist remark aimed at the basketball players, and both worked, successfully, to get him off television airwaves. In the Duke case, we will succumb to suffocation, I suspect, if we hold our breath waiting for them to apologize for feeding the racist frenzy that condemned those three young men whose lives were nearly ruined by innuendo, lies, an out-of-control prosecutor and a complicit media. We will also collapse onto the fainting couch waiting for an apology from Duke’s “Group of 88″ - the coalition of arts and science faculty who took out a full-page ad in the Duke newspaper commending students who demonstrated and distributed a “wanted” poster of the lacrosse team. Duke President Richard H. Brodhead, meanwhile, suspended the accused and canceled the rest of the lacrosse season. It was not a pretty day for due process. But the man behind the curtain orchestrating this travesty of justice was Mr. Nifong. In the rap vernacular that brought down Mr. Imus, he pimped the accuser, using an apparently troubled young woman for his political gain instead of sending her home where she belonged. Despite the obvious double standard among those who purport to work for racial harmony, the convergence of these two events may be the tipping point in our national debate about race, sex and speech. Let’s do cut close to the bone, but, lest we become enamored of our virtue, we should acknowledge a couple of facts: First, despite protestations to the contrary, it’s hard to believe NBC and CBS dropped Mr. Imus only because of his remarks. The two networks fired him, at least in part, because the show’s advertisers pulled out. Does anyone really doubt he would be on air today if the cash were still flowing? Second, Duke administrators and trustees, who are now demanding a complete investigation into Mr. Nifong’s behavior, are a year late and a conscience short. With notable exceptions, administrators and faculty behaved abominably. What a contrast to the support Rutgers gave its students. Those who have performed most honorably throughout this disgraceful season of sexual spin and racial one-upmanship are the athletes from both teams. Mature and dignified during their news conferences, they’ve put the grown-ups to shame and offer reason to hope that the rising generation of Americans will put this corrupt house in order.So today a choice will come, will we allow this to go the direction that the Reverands want it to, and in fact every racist group wants it to go, or do we use this as a spring board to focus on the very real problem of  injustice in our justice system. It is time for people of all races to tell their racist brothers to quit the chicken little blame game and take advantage of a window of opportunity to poetntially fix a very real problem in America which has become the largest prison society in the free world. I have always questioned the wisdom of prosecutors and judges being elected officials because of the potential to forego their job to appeal a lynching mentality.

case in point: Attorney General Cooper:

“We believe that these cases were the result of a tragic rush to accuse and a failure to verify serious allegations. Based on the significant inconsistencies between the evidence and the various accounts given by the accusing witness, we believe these three individuals are innocent of these charges.”

Now who is going to pay the legal fees for these young men? What if the prosecutor is unable to if he is found culpable? Would not prosecution of the false police report be worth it, if for no other reason to expose and vicndicate these young men , rather than leave them open to the questions by the Thin Black Dudes from slanttruth? May it not provide prima facia evidence in the case against the prosecutor, or will he be made the sacrificial lamb to keep the status quo of the system safe and protected from closer inspection?

Using Sharpton’s own standards as applied to Don Imus, Rev’s Sharpton and Jackson, an apology is not enough in the Duke Lacrosse case, which you went out of your way to exploit and convict without a trial. In doing so, you in fact condone the status quo of the system you claim is broken, when it is convenient for your personal gain. The ball is in your collective courts now, now what are you going to do with it????

Are Christians going to allow Sharpton and Jackson to allow this opportunity to address serious issues, just denigrate into a blame game, or are we going to seize the opportunity to strike at prosecutorial misconduct and allowing people to make false reports and ruin lives with no ramifications for their actions? It could be YOU next.

The art of reframing and distraction April 16, 2007

Posted by reformedville in : Ethnicity, Immigration, Government , add a comment

 (Picture laying all blame on pedro removed)

This is a typical redirection of argument tactic. One must really take a look at this situation logically. I lived in both Colorado and Florida where we had illegal immigration problems. In fact I am very much against illegal immigration , as I know legal immigrants who did it the right way and continue to do it the right way and it costs money and there is a process.

But is Pedro the problem? No Pedro is not the problem. If Pedro has no source of employment , or potential income, Pedro does not come and take the risks. But why does he come? Because employers want to hire Pedro because they can pay Pedro less money and no benefits. And who are these employers-mostly rich white guys who know if they get caught they pay a fine.  But it is not only rich white guys, it is the suburban homeowner who wants to save a buck to get his lawn cut cheap so he hires a service that hires illegals to save on labor costs. It is the national contract services who employ housekeepers in medical facilites because they will not ask for benefits or raises because they know they used a fresh hot social security number to get the job and it wont check out in six months, so if they demand a raise you suddenly need to check their social security number and green card status. And who are the employers ?, white guys who know the deal. 

 Remember this ? Tyson Execs Charged in Smuggling Illegal Aliens

 Mohawk Industries Inc.  and who did these employees displace?

ConAgra agreed in April 1998 to pay $223,000 in fines and other costs for knowingly hiring illegal immigrants. http://www.visalaw.com/98may/11may98.html  Note  also where alot of the food poisoning has come from-con agra foods. coincidence? Cargill CEO Warren Staley reportedly has in the past admitted his company hired illegal immigrants. In May 2006, Cargill closed beef-processing plants in six states and gave more than 15,000 workers the day off to attend a pro-immigration boycott. http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/metro/stories/MYSA050206.1A.immigration.12b59b38.htmlIn June 2005, Tyson Foods was sued by eight former employees alleging it reduced hourly pay by hiring illegal immigrants. In December 2001, Tyson Foods was charged with 36 counts of recruiting illegal workers from Mexico and transporting them to its poultry processing plants. In May of 2006, Tyson closed its processing plants to allow employees to attend pro-immigration marches. http://www.vdare.com/fulford/lawsuit.htm In the 2004 election cycle, Cargill and Tyson donated over $300,000 to Bush’s re-election bid.So is it really Pedro we should be mad at? Why aren’t we screaming at the ones responsible for the illegal immigration the employers? 

And young white guys-if you ever get your own region in seperatism, you will be the new Pedro, maybe your handlers havent told you, but if you think the white region is going to overpay it’s employees and lose profits, you need your head examined. Read a history book or a newspaper, we want the cheapest labor possible , will hire a minority in a second putting you out of work, and then bitch the first time they see a minority outside of work.  And instead of the Jews handling your mortgage the company store will own your entire existence and you can be a white slave.

Yeh, complain about Pedro when you are getting your lawn cut cheap, and a white guy is fighting for survival against the illegals and the law turns their head in good old boy Florida. Don’t take your anger out on Pedro, burn your neighbors lawn for hiring Pedro. Block the plants entrance for hiring illegals. Take it out on Pedro. Now that is a great distraction but it doesn’t hold water.

The art of reframing and distraction-part 2 April 16, 2007

Posted by reformedville in : Ethnicity, Immigration, Government , add a comment

Pedro part 2

Federal authorities have accused three cleaning company executives of pocketing more than $18.6 million in unpaid taxes collected from employing hundreds of illegal immigrants from Mexico, Central America, and Haiti, according to an indictment CNN obtained Thursday.

The money was placed by the three Rosenbaum Cunningham International executives into “shell companies,” and then was used to purchase such “extravagant” items as beach homes and racehorses, the document stated.

RCI Inc.’s president, vice president and controller were arrested along with 200 of the Florida-based company’s employees in a recent sweep by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, the assistant secretary of homeland security for ICE, Julie Myers, announced at a news conference.

A message on the company’s voicemail said that “RCI has ceased operations as of February 22, 2007.”

RCI Inc. provided janitorial services to numerous restaurant chains, including Hard Rock Cafes, Dave & Busters, House of Blues, Planet Hollywood, and Fox Sports Grill, the indictment states.

 
 

Tired of waiting for Washington to enforce immigration laws, small businesses have begun taking their competitors to court.

WASHINGTON, D.C. (FSB Magazine) — To see the latest front in the war over illegal immigration, take a look at Mordechai Orian. The 41-year-old owns Global Horizons, a Los Angeles-based service that supplies seasonal agricultural workers to apple, blueberry, and potato growers across the country. In May, Orian lost one of his biggest clients: Munger Bros., a Delano, Calif., blueberry farm, which decided to use a rival labor supplier, J&A Contracting of Bakersfield, Calif.

I.N.S. Looks the Other Way on Illegal Immigrant Labor
by Louis Uchitelle

CHICAGO — Salvador Silva often used to worry that immigration agents would raid the commercial laundry where he works. If they did, he had a plan. He would jump onto a table, hoist himself into an air-conditioning duct, and hide there until the agents left. He practiced this more than once.

“We lived with the uncertainty of raids,” said Mr. Silva, who is 26 and has worked illegally in this country for 10 years, ever since he walked across a bridge from Juárez in Mexico to El Paso and flew to Chicago to join a brother. Only now is he beginning to relax. “For the first time,” he said, “I don’t fear the raids.”

Such raids have all but stopped around the country over the last year. In a booming economy running short of labor, hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants are increasingly tolerated in the nation’s workplaces. The Immigration and Naturalization Service has made crossing the border harder than ever, stepping up patrols and prosecuting companies that smuggle in aliens or blatantly recruit them. But once inside the country, illegal immigrants are now largely left alone. Even when these people are discovered, arrests for the purpose of deportation are much less frequent; such arrests dropped to about 8,600 last year from 22,000 just two years earlier, the I.N.S. reports.

The agency now concentrates on picking up aliens who have committed a crime. The rest are in effect allowed to help American employers fill jobs. “It is just the market at work, drawing people to jobs, and the I.N.S. has chosen to concentrate its actions on aliens who are a danger to the community,” said Robert L. Bach, the agency’s associate commissioner for policy and planning.

U.S. illegal labor toils in a parallel universe

  • Border Agent Sentenced to 6 Years for Accepting Cash, Cars From Illegal Immigrant Smugglers 26 Mar 2007 20:55 GMT
    … years in prison for taking cash and cars from smugglers, allowing them to shuttle illegal immigrants from Mexico into the United States. , worked at the world’s busiest border crossing, the Port of Entry between Tijuana, Mexico, and …
  • A respected U.S. prosecutor faces a conservative backlash over convictions that sent two Border Patrol agents to prison 26 Mar 2007 20:55 GMT
    … who fired at a vehicle loaded with illegal immigrants, has heightened the outcry. T.J. Bonner, the … urban white-collar crime to drug smuggling and illegal immigration in a district that includes 660 miles … one person in the history of the United States, in our view,” said Bonner, the president …